Who should cover the cost of climate impact contributions: the business or the client?

Who’s Responsibility Is It to Cover the Cost?

‍

Here is a simple yet thought-provoking question:

“Who should cover the cost of climate impact contributions: the business or the client?”

‍

It sparks an engaging discussion that touches on values, accountability, and the evolving role of businesses in addressing environmental challenges.

At first glance, it might seem like a straightforward operational decision. Do we build the cost of climate contributions into our pricing, transparently passing it on to the client, or do we, as a company, absorb it as part of our commitment to sustainability?

‍

But underneath that practical question lies something deeper: who owns the responsibility for impact?

‍

Option 1: The Client Pays

Building the contribution into the client’s payment has a certain appeal. It creates transparency, customers can see exactly what portion of their purchase supports climate restoration or offsets environmental impact. It can also serve as an educational moment, helping clients connect their choices to tangible outcomes for the planet.

However, it can also create a perception problem if not communicated carefully. Some may feel they’re being “charged extra” for something that should already be part of doing business responsibly.

‍

Option 2: The Business Pays

On the other hand, when a company takes full responsibility for these costs, it sends a clear signal about its values. It says, “We believe sustainability is our responsibility, not an optional add-on.”

This approach can strengthen trust, demonstrate authenticity, and align with long-term brand purpose. But it’s also a financial commitment, and not every business can absorb that cost without trade-offs elsewhere.

‍

A Shared Responsibility?

Perhaps the most realistic answer lies somewhere in between. A shared model, where both the business and the client contribute, reflects the idea that sustainability is a collective effort.

After all, businesses operate within systems shaped by consumer demand, and consumers increasingly want to support companies that act with integrity and purpose.

‍

The Bigger Picture

In the end, the question “Who pays?” isn’t just about money. It’s about ownership — of values, of impact, and of the future we’re all helping to build.

There may never be a universal answer, but asking the question itself is a step toward greater awareness and accountability. Because whether the cost is absorbed or passed on, what matters most is that the impact is being made.

‍

What’s your view?
Should businesses absorb the cost of their climate impact, or should it be transparently included in what clients pay?

‍

Your business has the power to create visible, lasting climate impact. Partner with ON A MISSION to turn your operations into reforestation and biodiversity gains.

Reach out to Rob (rob@onamission.world) to explore a partnership

‍